« The Return of Russian Realpolitik | Main | Sarzkozy and the future of French Foreign and Security Policy: an American in Paris? »

Is the Polish veto really about meat?

The z4141744X.jpgEU-Russia summit which just had place in Samara has not managed to solve the current problems in the EU-Russia relations. The problem centres on their inability to forge an agreement on the renewal of their Partnership and Co-operation Agreement of 1997,  as the Polish government continues to block EU efforts for further negotiations with Russia. Poland's main gripe is that Russia continues to attempt to influence Polish politics more than 17 years after the fall of the Berlin Wall - in this case, Putin is refusing to allow Poland to export meat to Russia. But this current impasse has succeeded in demonstrating something else: proving that the EU can stand together in foreign affairs.

The Polish veto showed that either the EU did not want to listen to earlier Polish requests to have their views on Russia taken into account - or that Polish diplomacy had not yet managed to exert influence within the EU. Poland decided to veto EU-Russia negotiations  as she felt isolated on the issue of EU-Russia relations and feared that the EU would continue negotiations with Moscow - even without Polish agreement. Russia’s expectations were similar. Even after Angela Merkel’s declaration that the case of the Russian embargo on Polish meat is not a bilateral problem, but the EU problem, Putin still seemed to insist the opposite. After Samara he had to admit that solidarity among the EU  member states is no longer a distant proposition.

But Polish veto is actually mainly not about the meat, and not about the energy security. It is about the Polish position within the EU .

After the Samara summit, Polish decision makers and experts declared: we got what we wanted. Therefore what Poland actually wanted was the declaration of solidarity, proving that Poland is an equal EU member and Russia is not going to achieve anything playing only with big EU powers: France or Germany. The Polish veto was not aimed at Russia - but at the EU itself.

The declaration of the European solidarity made at Samara is a very important sign for Russia, that the time of bilateral relations with major EU states is over and Poland, Lithuania and Estonia can block the development of relations with Russia. The game of playing on the EU division lines is becoming very risky for Moscow.

It also carries a very important message for Poland: your problems are our problems, we solve them together.

In Samara the EU demonstrated its solidarity with Poland. The question remains, however - will Poland now start to demonstrate more solidarity with the EU itself?

Posted on Tuesday, May 22, 2007 at 04:51PM by Registered CommenterJoanna Kaminska | Comments3 Comments

Reader Comments (3)

Hi Joanna,
Very interesting indeed. EU-Russia relations are certainly very important and what your blog highlights so well is that different EU countries view Russia in very different ways. Despite this - the solidarity demonstrated by the EU during this current impasse is certainly a turn up for the books.
Do you think that tensions will continue into the future? What do current events signal in terms of the emergent European order?

May 22, 2007 | Registered CommenterDr Alister Miskimmon

Hi Alister,

I believe that tensions might continue if Russia will fail to recognize this change in the EU approach.
What not only Poland, but also other Soviet ex-sattelites want from Russia is to be recognized as equal partners. And Russia is having problems with that. But it is changing. After Samara Putin decided to "intensify the dialogue" on the trade, including a dispute over Polish meat imports and also there are voices (Russian expert's voices I mean) that Russia has to cope with the fact of Poland, Estonia, Lithuania and other former members of the Soviet block being independent and strong members of international community.
It is true that the atmosphere between Poland and Russia is quite tense but the Estonian cyber war, about which you have written, prove that it is not only a problem of the Polish government. It is Russia's move now. But I think those relations are going to be difficult in the future.
I only hope that new EU members, especially Poland, can better understand that it is the EU not US they should be solidary with and will support futher deepening of the EU instead of slowing it down.

May 22, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterJoanna K.

I don't think Poland will be solidary. Poland is a very realist player

June 14, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterKasia

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>